74 lines
9.8 KiB
Markdown
74 lines
9.8 KiB
Markdown
|
# Document Roadmap TechDoc
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is a proposed roadmap to creating the TechDoc file. The documents are grouped by "Design Phase". To each
|
||
|
document, a responsible person is assigned as the author. Go through the list phase by phase. You can mix up
|
||
|
the order of documents within a phase, but I recommend to finalize documents from one phase before moving on
|
||
|
to the next.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PHASE 1: Planning & Feasability
|
||
|
|
||
|
| Document | Author | Comment |
|
||
|
|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
|
| Intended Use | CEO | This is the most important document of your TechDoc. Business and Regulatory Strategy depend on it. |
|
||
|
| Medical Device Classification | QA/RA Manger | Defining the product's medical device classification acc. to MDR. |
|
||
|
| Product Roadmap | Product Manager | Not an essential document. This is for feasibility assessments and resource planning. Helps to keep track of what's to come. |
|
||
|
| Software Development and Maintenance Plan | Software Developer | Giving product-specific information on the tools, resources and methods to be used for software development. Helpful for developer teams to align regarding the development setup. |
|
||
|
| Change Evaluation List | QA/RA Manger | Listing and assessing gaps between the last and the upcoming software version. Follows criteria from MDCG 2020-3. Not needed for the very first release. |
|
||
|
| Risk Management Plan and Risk Acceptance Matrix | Risk Manager | Specifies the methods for assessing risks to be used for the product at hand. Defines probability and severity categories and acceptable ranges. |
|
||
|
| Clinical Evaluation Plan | Clinician / Scientific Person | Specifying the methodology that shall be used to assess the clinical benefits and risks of the product. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PHASE 2: Specification
|
||
|
|
||
|
| Document | Author | Comment |
|
||
|
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
|
| User Needs List | Product Manager | This is a list of high-level requirements. Most of them will be implemented through Software Requirements. |
|
||
|
| User Needs Checklist | QA/RA Manager | Checking if the User Needs List makes sense. |
|
||
|
| Software Requirements List | Developer-adjacent person | Specifying how User Needs will be incorporated in the software. Describing the details of a feature. |
|
||
|
| List of Hazard-Related Use Scenarios | Risk Manager | Identifying scenarios in which users could be prone to hazards. |
|
||
|
| Risk Table | Risk Manager | Anticipating and assessing risks. Gathering input from various channels. |
|
||
|
| Software Requirements Checklist | QA/RA Manager | Checking if the Software Requirements List makes sense. |
|
||
|
| Software Test Plan | Software Developer | Defining tests for every Software Requirement and mapping them to each other. |
|
||
|
| Usability Test Plan | Product Manager / Usability Engineer | Specifying the methodologies to be used to conduct the Usability Test. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PHASE 3: Development
|
||
|
|
||
|
| Document | Author | Comment |
|
||
|
|-----------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
|
| SOUP List | Software Developer | List of external libraries, frameworks and packages used in the product, incl. their assessment of criticality. |
|
||
|
| Software Architecture | Software Developer | Description/Graphic outlining the software components and their interaction. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
The actual programming work takes place in this phase. It makes sense to create the SOUP list and the software
|
||
|
architecture immediately before programming begins and to adjust them if anything changes during code
|
||
|
creation. These documents should actually be created in advance, but due to the iterative nature of software
|
||
|
development, it will not be possible to plan everything before the actual work begins. Therefore, it makes
|
||
|
sense to create them in parallel with the programming.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PHASE 4: Verification and Validation
|
||
|
|
||
|
| Document | Author | Comment |
|
||
|
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
|
| Software Test Results | QA Tester | Results of the Software Tests: passed or failed? |
|
||
|
| List of Known Anomalies | Software Developer / Product Manager | List of known bugs and failed software tests. Justification why the software can still be released without impacting benefit/safety and a timeline when those bugs will be fixed. |
|
||
|
| Instructions For Use | Person with the best overview | The name says it all. |
|
||
|
| Usability Test Protocol | Product Manager / Usability Engineer | Specifying the actual usability test cases: Testing User Needs, Hazard-Related Use Scenarios and Instructions for Use. |
|
||
|
| Usability Test Report | Product Manager | Summary of the results of the Usability Test. |
|
||
|
| Clinical Evaluation Report | Clinician / Scientific Person | Analysing scientific data to prove the products safety and efficacy. |
|
||
|
| Risk Management Report | Risk Manager | Summary of the Risk Management Activities |
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PHASE 5: Product Release
|
||
|
|
||
|
| Document | Author | Comment |
|
||
|
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
|
| GSPR List | QA/RA Manager | Checking if the "General Safety and Performance Requirements" are fulfilled. |
|
||
|
| PMS (/PMCF) Plan | QA/RA Manager | Planning the product-specific activities for Post-Market Surveillance. If the clinical data is not sufficient, also plan Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up activities. |
|
||
|
| Software Release Checklist | QA/RA Manager | Checking if all the requirements are fulfilled, if the documents are complete and if the product is safe to be used. |
|
||
|
| Release Notes | Product Manager OR Software Developer | Description of new features in the current release. |
|
||
|
| Declaration of Conformity | QA/RA and CEO | Declaring the product's conformity with the regulations and standards. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
Template Copyright [openregulatory.com](https://openregulatory.com). See [template
|
||
|
license](https://openregulatory.com/template-license).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Please don't remove this notice even if you've modified contents of this template.
|